The problem with Nigel; a major contradiction.

This morning at 3.30ish I found myself rudely awoken by none other than Nigel Farage who had got inside my head and was causing an upset!

There's a problem with Nigel and it's a glaring one that is for some strange reason being ignored. The issue in question is a contradiction that journalists and political commentators ought to address and demand an answer for. Central to UKIP's argument is that the British people were never asked for their permission in what is supposed to be a 'democracy' prior to fitting us up with an EU straitjacket and that forty years in, we've an absolute right to give a verdict on what has happened to the country since. As a result of membership for which permission was not sought, political sovereignty has been surrendered and the same fate has befallen our legal sovereignty as a result of lawyers binding us into the European Court of Human Rights. So now we answer to foreign politicians, bureaucrats and judges, all of which is wrong, and all of which Nigel reckons he's on the case about.

A country's COMMERCIAL SOVEREIGNTY is every bit as important to the life of the nation as is political and legal sovereignty, and yet, Nigel has nothing to say on that crucial matter. On the contrary, he's on the record for saying the NHS should be privatised and so presumably should the BBC. Who would buy our precious NHS? Hard bitten American, Chinese, Russian business interests with a view to utilising the sick people of Britain as business assets to be exploited to the maximum that's who.

We can be certain that will happen because that is exactly the fate to have befallen every other formerly owned by us all state asset, shipped out and into the portfolios of overseas business interests, management, and shareholders.

Nigel grew up a child of Thatcher and makes plain he is her greatest fan. As a City of London dealer operating at the heart of the casino culture monetarism 'gifted' our nation, he made plenty of cash from the sell-offs that began in the early 1980's and continue to date (The history and heritage of the Royal Mail having just been destroyed at a stroke of Vince Cable's pen and the process of a foreign takeover taking place currently) My question to Nigel is... If the surrendering of political and legal sovereignty is wrong (which it plainly is) how can it be right to wilfully hand over control of our commerce on which so many livelihoods depend, and which provides the nation with so much in terms of identity; to foreign control? Come on Nige, what's the answer?